Moeiteloos slapen – zonder regels
What is the benefit of being able to lift 100 kg if the true challenge is carrying the weight of an entire organization? As a CHRO, why do vitality programs so frequently equate muscle power with brain power?
Why do we continue to assume that vitality is primarily a matter of physical health?
What value does the ability to lift 100 kg provide when the real demand is to bear the strategic and operational burden of an organization?
Vitality remains a domain rife with wishful thinking. We still tend to equate it with physical health and assume that if people are healthy, they will naturally become more engaged or “move.”
This assumption reflects flawed thinking and carries significant costs.
– It delivers no measurable return on investment.
– It fails to genuinely motivate people—particularly those who carry the heaviest responsibilities within the organization.
The essence of effective vitality lies in detaching it from a narrow focus on physical health and redefining it according to the specific requirements of each role.
Some roles demand physical strength, while others require exceptional cognitive and mental stamina. Both constitute forms of vitality, yet what delivers value in one context may be irrelevant—or even counterproductive—in another.
Join me in the journey of Redefining Vitality.
From gadget to key performance indicator